Description
The research question seeks to determine the degree that nationalism played as a contributing factor in the American Civil War. The United States currently applies analytic and diagnostic frameworks to potential hotspots around the globe in order to determine their likelihood or potential for violence. Foreign policy and preventive measures are shaped by the predictions of these diagnostic tools. What prognosis would they bare if used in retrospect on the American Civil War? Would they indicate the war as being inevitable or unnecessary? The answer to these questions is based largely on the causal link between certain nationalism movements and their potential risk for violence. I propose to answer these questions and the “why civil war?” question using the analytic tool developed by Stephen Evera. Many view the American Civil War as inevitable while others propose it was an unnecessary tragedy. How do we answer the question, “why a civil war?” We can answer this question subjectively or through a more scientific process. The debate over a more scientific study forms the problem background and significance of my study. It is my hypothesis that the issue of nationalism greatly impacted the risk of war. Stephen Van Evera, a political science teacher at M.I.T., makes a strong case for the causal link between nationalism and war. I will explain and use Evera’s two part analytic framework of “immediate/proximate causes” and the three underlying catalytic factors of the immediate/proximate causes. (structural, political/environmental and perceptual factors) as an assessment tool. I will apply this analytic framework or tool to the federal and the southern/Confederate nationalist movements. This analysis will explain the conditions that cause certain nationalist movements to escalate to violence and it will offer judgment on the role nationalism played in the escalation between north and south. Finally, we’ll address the question of how, if at all, can the war causin attr
